Synorigin
Example checks
Real results, reproduced as they came back - including the unflattering ones and the ones where nothing close was found.
The six checks at the top are recorded sessions. Each carries a note stating exactly when it was run and under what conditions. The last two are marked as method demonstrations rather than transcripts, because Synorigin has not been publicly benchmarked on those specific mediums and presenting an invented result as a real one would defeat the point of the tool.
A character concept
A fantasy character built on one premise - and the structural weakness that came back.
A plot twist
Three films that already run the same mechanism, each named by what it shares.
A product idea
Named shipping products rather than story tropes, and a genuine product-strategy gap.
Two invented names
What happens when nothing close exists - and why that result is deliberately rare.
A live trademark collision
The same question as an ordinary naming check, escalated as a legal problem instead.
A genre-convention premise
Harry Potter and Star Wars named directly, with the percentage called high, not softened.
A screenplay concept
Method demonstration - how a screen story premise is read.
A game concept
Method demonstration - reading the mechanic rather than the setting.